By: Paul Gryglewicz & Peter Landers
It is 2016 and Wells Fargo had just “survived” one of the biggest scandals of the decade. The creation of millions of fraudulent checking and saving accounts in the names of clients who had not given their consent. This event resulted in the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars and over 5,000 employees. A hit like this is not easily resolved or swept under the rug. But how? How did this company, one of the biggest banks in the world, dig itself into such a deep, expensive hole?
Human Capital Management or “HCM” is becoming an integral part of an organization’s stated priorities as they seek to successfully utilize their people to attain individual as well as organizational goals. In order to achieve this objective, organizations must view their employees as assets with value that need to be retained, as opposed to resources that can be exploited. HCM involves hiring, managing, training and retaining talented and high performing employees. While this has always been challenging, the adoption of technology has proven to be beneficial and essential in streamlining this process. Companies such as Workday and Ultimate Software have created software systems that Human Resources professionals have started to leverage more and more to manage their HCM challenges, below the executive level, in this ever-evolving environment. However, there is still a disconnect and lack of attention when it comes to leveraging technology to manage Executive level human capital.
There’s a slight spring in your step as you saunter to the door after a grueling, but productive 3.5-hour AGM. For the time being, your reality is a harmonious world in which your company’s board of directors and shareholders are in sync and the mystic rivers of communication are flowing openly. This world is built upon a foundation of trust - trust that shareholders’ give to their board of directors, because they hope that the board is doing what they can to protect their financial interests. Despite a universal standard of trust, every once in a while, a breach may cause a shareholder (or two) to go rogue. Rogue, activist shareholders may attempt to use their influence to bring change for or within the company.
Most of you should be (figuratively or literally) familiar with Murphy’s Law: “Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong,” and throughout history, this saying has been validated time and time again. Therefore, if you ever wonder if or when corporate governance should be considered important, the simple answer should be “ALWAYS.”
The heart of proxy season is upon us with the majority of Annual General Meetings (AGMs) scheduled to take place over the next couple of months. These meetings will highlight shareholder votes on important issues such as the election of directors for the upcoming year and approval of the company’s auditors. In many cases, shareholders will also be voting on whether they approve or disapprove of the compensation provided to a company’s top executives (otherwise known as a “Say on Pay” vote) or re-approving a company’s equity compensation plans for employees. It is on these last two issues (Say on Pay and equity compensation plan approval) where a company’s disclosure on executive compensation can play a critical role in influencing the outcome of votes at the AGM.
In 2011, Hewlett Packard (HP), was one of the most recognizable names in technology and at the forefront of the technological world. However, when the board decided to bring on a CEO with a spotted history, as well as relieve four other board members publicly, the company’s stock began to plummet. This entire fiasco could have been avoided if the board had practiced one very important skill. That skill is doing your due diligence.
Everything will change. If you come away with anything from this blog, it is an understanding that it is critical that Boards of Directors and Executives understand that to succeed in today’s business environment, they must take a giant leap and embrace the digital transformation. Boards and executives are facing a myriad of challenges and can only successfully address them by leveraging artificial intelligence, data analytics, and digital communications. Everything will change – how board members interact with each other; how they make decisions; how they address issues from governance to corporate social responsibility; how they recruit and retain high performance executive teams; and how they will communicate with both shareholders and stakeholders.
In 1864, Herbert Spencer’s book, Principles of Biology, introduced the world to the phrase “survival of the fittest.” This phrase then sparked the ongoing argument surrounding competition and whether it is ingrained in human nature. So, it can be argued that if there is an opportunity to compare one thing to another, it is second nature for competition/comparisons to arise. In essence, once there is more than one of anything it is natural for competition/comparisons to surface.
It's the holidays and you’re the chosen victim to host this year’s family dinner. Unfortunately, this dinner doesn’t get your undivided attention because your AGM happens to be right around the corner, and you have the meeting and motions to prepare for. Lucky for you, there’s a universal "recipe" that can ensure success in the kitchen and the boardroom…
A well-written English Trifle recipe is similar to a well-written board meeting motion. It's unique, concise, specific and ensures that your family can taste the whipped cream that you infused into each individual raspberry, the same way your board members can see the hard work you put into your motion.